Incase I want to take pictures of something 18 to 32 miles away…..
Canon 1200/5.6L USM
Need something longer? A Canon Extender EF 1.4x boosts the beast up to a 1680/8, and the Canon Extender EF 2x will get you to a 2400/11. For what it’s worth, if you couple this lens to a Rebel XTi or EOS 40D you end up with the 35mm-equivalent of 1920/5.6, a 2688/8 with a 1.4x extender, and a 3840/11 with a 2x extender. If you need to focus any tighter to your subject you’ll have to hop a plane and fly there.
It’s a good thing I don’t have that much money floating around or I could be a danger to myself.
Stopped down to f/8 and f/11 it’s actually quite remarkable. How remarkable? From midtown Manhattan we were able to read the street signs on the corner of JFK Boulevard East and 43rd St. in Weehawkin New Jersey when viewing image files at pixel resolution. It’s important to keep in mind when you are shooting images of objects literally a mile away or further you start contending with haze, smog, and heat radiation that can greatly diminish the image quality of the best optics, especially during warmer months.
Sooo…. the final word count of my last post? 5000 words.
I had to make up for all the time I didn’t post.
But if you felt that the article ended a bit abruptly, your probably right. I posted the post before I was finished writing it, and didn’t finish it off till 6pm the next day, so if you feel that it didn’t quite end properly maybe you should check it out again.
Oh, and I’m now doing stuff in silverlight…. I have a feeling, that photoshoping a picture for a joke might seem passe when compared to what I’ve been doing recently.
So tonight I saw a presentation at the local .net user group meeting on Silverlight. And though it was ok, I figured I could prob do better for the people who were wondering what exactly Silverlight was…
So tonight I saw a presentation at the local .net user group meeting on Silverlight. And though it was ok, I figured I could prob do better for the people who were wondering what exactly Silverlight was, and since this meeting was one of the most packed user group meetings I’ve ever seen, I figured there might be a few of them.
To understand better we need to first look at the history of the web.
Let’s go back… Way back to the beginning.
In the beginning was the command line. But that really wasn’t that useful.
So one day at a place called CERN a guy called Tim Berners Lee (now Sir Tim Berners Lee) came up with this thing called Hyper Text to link together all the physics-y type information they had floating around at the particle accelerator.
For hyper text to work he developed a server that transferred these documents (the Hyper Text Transfer Protocol) of a specific type (Hyper Text Markup Language). To serve the protocol he worked on the first web server program – called Mosaic. And to read the documents he came up with a Hyper Text Markup Language Browser also called…. wait for it… wait for it… Mosaic.
Lots of people noticed that the linked hyper text documents when you drew out the connections between them looked like a web. This web soon spanned physics departments around the world and the web became the world wide web. (www)… or a net…. an internet.
This idea took off in certain circles, but was limited. The software for it was licensed in a some what drackonian fashion, and so these other guys decided they could do it better. So they created a program called Netscape Navigator.
If you look at Netscape Navigator 1.0 today it’s pretty simple. All it can basically do is show you a document in plain black and white text along with links between pages (usually colored blue). The guys working on Netscape figured since they have to sell this better and it was taking off with others besides physics geeks that they needed to make it prettier, so they allowed you to also put images on web pages.
And thus the horror of web design was spawned.
Netscape continued to develop until version 3 when they hit the tipping point. Windows 3.1 and the then new Windows 95 exploded into peoples homes. People soon realized that they too could connect to the Web just like Universities had been doing for years. Soon regular Joes were surfing the web and making web pages, instead of just Physicists come Knights.
…. now hold on a second I’m going to completely change tracks for a second and we’ll come back to this point in history in a second….
With regular Joes making web pages, and surfing web pages it soon became apparent that you needed tools to make your web pages prettier than everyone else’s. And to do this Joe shmoe come new title of web developer needed publishing tools.
Up until this point there had been 2 companies making tidy fortunes developing software for magazine publishers to make magazines. Said companies: Corel who made Corel Draw (among other tools), and Adobe made this little program called Photoshop (among other tools).
Since then Corel has imploded while trying to diversify into the OS market with a crappy version of linux, and a deluded hardware expedition. Which means Adobe and Photoshop are responsible for Fark and icanhascheezburger, but they don’t really care since the retail MSRP for photoshop is close to $999.
But a funny thing happened in the graphics and publishing market… there was a dark horse, a third party, a company known as Macromedia.
Macromedia started back in the early 90’s with another name, and a program that made install shield type popup programs when you put a cd in the drive of a mac. But since it was a mac, it was more AV based. This program was what eventually became known as Shockwave.
(and my aside is done… for now… we’ll come back to it in a second)
So Netscape realized back in the days of Netscape 1.0 that they could never write code to display every type of file. They could do the big ones, like Jpeg, gif, txt, html. But there were a multitude of lesser known file types out there that they couldn’t write code to display, and if someone came up with a new file type they wouldn’t be able to do anything about it, after the code had shipped. So they single handily made tags that allowed you to embed other file types in your hyper text markup language pages. The embedded file would be downloaded by the browser and displayed by piece of code written by a third party, and if you didn’t have the piece of code that could display the file, the embed tag would also have information on where you could go to get it.
But Macromedia looked at the web and thought it was boooooring (animated gifs of dancing kittens aside) and decided to take their Shockwave product, rip out all the code parts of it, and turn it into a plugin for Netscape so that you could load images, play sounds, and do simple navigation. The web instantly became more interesting, but at the expense of not being able to navigate directly to content using the address bar, and the back button.
The act of making what we now know as Flash, also meant that control of making web pages left the physics geeks and the joe shmoes, and now moved directly into the hands of the designers who used to only do magazines, and video stuff on the Mac. The web instantly became more pretty, and the yellow and green text on a grey background webpage quickly died out.
The thing was that Macromedia didn’t have that many coding geeks, and mainly had these designers…. so the programs that created these new flash files were designed for people who worked visually, and didn’t know $hit about coding.
Okay…. back to the browser track….
By the time Netscape Navigator 3 arrived Microsoft realized they’d been missing out on this whole web thing and decided to release Internet Explorer…. and… it stank… It wasn’t just bad, it was horrible. Even giving IE 1.0 away for free, people weren’t using it and were buying Netscape Navigator instead. But Microsoft had cash to spare and decided to keep on trying. So they released Internet Explorer 2.0… and it didn’t suck as much, but it still sucked. So Microsoft decided to get desperate and pre-installed Internet Explorer 3.0 on windows 98. And it was alright…. (this is also yet another proof that Microsoft doesn’t make a decent product until version 3… or at least 3.1).
But Microsoft being Microsoft did things their own weird way (and also a way to destroy Netscape using the sheer numbers of IE installed on windows 98). Not wanting to use Netscape’s pluggin architecture, they decided to do their own plugins, using a different tag (unfortunately so we had to write code for both and use weird <object><embed></object> type syntax). To do this they resurrected the horror that only true old school vanilla C developers understand:COM via OLE and re-branded it as ActiveX. ActiveX didn’t fare too well though…. maybe it had something to do with the fact that if you used it, any old Tom, Dick, or Harry could create a web page that would completely delete your machine… if you were lucky… if you were unlucky it would steal your banking info.
By this time Netscape realized they were in trouble and quickly released Netscape 4. (and Netscape 4.1, Netscape 4.2, Netscape 4.3 and Netscape 4.4) and at this time they started to whine about standards since both browsers were now reading the same documents completely differently.
Microsoft’s response in the ultimate version of marketing one up manship was to change the name of IE 4 to IE 5 and continue to stomp out Netscape where ever they could find them. Now Netscape had had to give Netscape 4 away for free just to compete with Microsoft.
By this time the Netscape Browser core had become a nasty mess of hacks and problems. The once tidy, small, and most importantly fast, core had become bloated and unmanageable. Netscape decided to start Netscape 5 from scratch…. and in the process went completely belly up. But in a last desperate move before being bought out by AOL, they gave away all their source code…. The Mozilla Browser was born.
Sooooo lets recap…..
Microsoft destroys Netscape to rule the web,
Adobe Destroys Corel,
And Macromedia Flash commits fratracide on Shockwave to do all the fancy smancy websites,
Programmers get muscled out of the pretty parts of the web,
Designers make the web pretty, but don’t know how code,
pain and misery for all…..
But what the FUCK does this have to do with Silverlight you say?
Glad you asked… We’re done with (most of) the history now and we’re getting to it.
So without Corel to pick on any more, Adobe got fat and lazy (See Adobe PDF Reader for proof). But these Macromedia guys started to really take over in the design space. They had a slew of useful programs that were starting to infringe on Adobe’s profits. Tools like Dreamweaver, Fireworks, Flash were leaving the web and were starting to infringe on Photoshop and Illustrator.
Adobe’s response? make a better product? No.
Send in the lawyers, and start to work on something that could stop the Juggernaut that was Flash.
Since the days of Sir Tim, at the beginning of the web, almost all the images on the web had been encoded in little points of color. Jpegs, Gifs, and Pngs are all made up of points of colors, that when you zoom in on them become squares. The thing was that for stuff like pictures of text and line drawings it was actually more efficient to store the pictures as individual brush strokes or vectors than to store the all those points.
Flash had a huge advantage here since from the beginning they’d had this vector stuff. Online flash animations aren’t stored as pictures that are flipped though, but as individual sketches, that were moved specific amounts according to math (cartoon animators are even doing cartoons directly in flash these days). The problem only got worse as people started getting massive monitors. Pictures that had once taken up the entire screen now only covered a fraction of it, but when you blew those pictures up, they became blocky and impossible to discern details. Vectors didn’t have that problem because they were all instructions on how to move pens…. just up the pen size when you needed to make things bigger, and the edges were still smooth.
This Vector technology, as well as the ability to combine it with old fashion pictures is the graphics core of Flash, and Adobe wanted in.
So Adobe created a new file format, called SVG, that supported all the new buzzwords. Underneath it’s XML just like the web itself, so browsers should have been easily able to open and display it, and they gave away the specification on how to create and read these files, so that any coder could use it, but the best way to create these files was with Adobe tools.
Add a little animation and sound to this file format and you had the equivalent of early versions of Flash. And since it was text just like a webpage, anyone could read one, and create one. So that’s exactly what Adobe did. The best place to see SVG these days is in the icons on a linux system. They scale nicely from your cell phone’s 2 inch screen that’s running some stripped down version of linux, to the massive displays of the latest generation of desktop computers.
So what was Adobe to do?
The answer came only just (relatively)recently… they gave up on pimping SVG, and just bought out Macromedia instead. So now it’s not Macromedia Flash, it’s Adobe Flash.
But Adobe wasn’t alone in trying to kill off Flash. Microsoft had also been eying it. Flash has never played nice with browsers, and was taking over more and more of the web.
So Microsoft decided that flash had to die.
The Brutus of this assassination?…. his name is Silverlight.
Back after the disaster that had been Windows ME, Microsoft decided to completely re-write the core of their consumer Operating System. What eventually became XP started off as the core of Windows 2000. Looking at the technology to make a properly modular operating system, they decided to end the developer nightmare that had become known as DLL hell (a side effect of COM and ActiveX). The new technology to make sure all the back end plumbing of the new operating system didn’t self destruct was the underpinnings of what’s now known as .NET.
A large portion of the hydra known as .NET is really just the next version of ActiveX, which in turn is the latest version of OLE, which is the latest version of COM. But Microsoft finally got it right (Notice that we’re beyond the 3rd version????). Up until this point the best way to develop ActiveX and OLE was to use VisualBasic, but by this time Visual basic had accumulated more cruft than a prostitute at a bukakke convention. It didn’t help that Visual Basic wasn’t really considered a proper language anyways.
Seeing the number of changes that would be required for VB to work with this new OS back end of XP, Microsoft made a brave decision to start fresh. Tabula Rasa… They decided to completely over haul VB, and while they were at it the entire set of development technologies that powers windows. At this time Sun’s Java was making a big splash in academic circles, but let’s face it Sun didn’t have the 800lb gorilla that was Visual Studio, and the millions upon millions of windows business developers needed to create critical mass. Microsoft again decided to Destroy a potential rival, and the .NET programing suite was born. Allot of the .NET Runtime’s features are direct spin offs, or FU’s at Sun’s Java. Sure technically .NET was an ECMA standard that could run on any platform (a great out with anti-trust lawyers that after the whole Netscape thing were circling Microsoft like a pack of hungry Sharks), but they never expected some insane individual to actually go and do it.
Anyways after the launch of XP and .NET, microsoft realized they had a new very powerfull tool. .NET soon found its way into everything Microsoft touched. PDA’s run a very small version of .NET, and the latest PDA operating system developed by Microsoft was developed almost completely in .NET. Using the PDA code Microsoft also created a slew of new products. It’s an upgraded version of this compact runtime that runs the Xbox. It turns out the whole multi platform targetability of .NET was actually useful as opposed to an out with the lawyers.
By this time the line between a desktop program, and a web page had started to blur. Technically Microsoft started it, when they included a piece of ActiveX code with IE 3 that allowed the web page interface of Microsoft’s Email Server program Exchange to send data back and forth to the server without the user actually doing anything. This was an updated version of an idea the Netscape guys had had in Netscape 2, but had never put much effort into.
Smart people looking to recover after the 2001 .com bubble soon seized on this technology after Google used it to automatically update your inbox in Gmail. But it took someone with a touch of marketing savy to change the name that had been XMLHTTPRequest into the more palatable AJAX.
This blurring of the lines in programming scared Microsoft silly. The part of Microsoft that actually made windows, was only really operating at break even profitablity. The real money was in the Office Suite. But if people could run Office from web pages, Microsoft would loose it’s nice little monopoly. Without the need to run Office, people wouldn’t need Windows, and the river of money that Office generated would dry up.
That being said there were still a few places where web pages couldn’t compete. The interface was slightly klunky, and differences in browsers also meant that web pages usually looked slightly different on different web browsers. But when people combined the AJAX technology with Flash, you had a program/web page that behaved like a program, but didn’t require an installer, was always up to date, and was accessible from anywhere, all you needed was an internet connection. These new web applications known as Rich Internet Applications (RIA) were deemed the way of the future, and since Adobe wrote the code that displayed the graphics it always looked the same on any platform. Microsoft was loosing control and they were terrified.
So a few years ago (from today, early 2008) Microsoft began to line up Flash for a killshot.
Eventually rumors leaked out of Redmond that Microsoft was beginning to work on a Flash killer. It even got a code name: Sparkle. Though for the longest time that was all that anyone knew. Adobe/Macromedia didn’t take this sitting down. They’d picked up Allaire a few years before (mainly to kill the largest competitor for Dreamweaver at the time Homesite), but in the process also got a technology called ColdFusion. This had been the main competitor for ASP 1.0, but Microsoft had figured it defeated ages ago. Adobe/Macromedia leveraged this technology to create FLEX, a back end system for Flash that allowed the Flash RIAs to behave more like programs, with better data transmission systems back and forth from the servers, as well as the ability to operate offline.
The thing was, Flash had never been designed for this new programmability. Action script was and still is creaking at the seams as it desperately tries to hold together the logic that controls Flash Animations. The Designers didn’t really understand how to program it, and Programmers couldn’t stand the interface and design decisions that had been made for the Designers. As a result FLEX has kind of been a dud.
And it appeared that Microsoft was doing nothing. But deep within the bowels of Redmond, Microsoft was lining up the big guns to fire a broad side at Flash.
Oddly enough the underpinnings of this technology which we now call Silverlight started with the same concept as Adobe’s earlier efforts to confront Flash with SVG. Microsoft defined a new document format that looked almost exactly like SVG called XAML. Technically Microsoft says that XAML was developed for the new consumer operating system called Vista.
Modern operating systems are again suffering under the same strain as web pages, with respect to the massive disparity in size of monitors used to access them. A 32×32 pixel icon that had been an inch square on on Windows 95 was now only an 8th of an inch wide on the new 30 inch monitors, but the same code is expected to run on an Ipod like device where the entire screen is 3 inches across. Again vector based file systems came to the rescue of Vista… it allows for skinning applications and all the pretty ness of the OS.
Microsoft called this new graphics technology WPF (windows presentation foundation), to replace the GDI (Graphics Device Interface) that had been around since Windows 95. The thing was/is, Vista has kinda been a dud as well… It’s too bloated, too slow, and doesn’t offer enough over XP to really justify the insane upgrade price, let alone the confusion over which version to buy among the 28 SKUs.
As a kind of aside to the announcement of WPF Microsoft also mentioned it was working on an extension to it called WPF/E (Windows Presentation Framework/Everywhere). Lookup WPF/E in wikipedia and you get redirected to Silverlight’s page… this was the unveiling of Microsoft’s Flash killer… but like the flash of artillery being fired over the horizon, it’s very easy to over look what’s been unleashed.
So….. Time for another recap…..
Adobe becomes scared of Macromedia and Flash and introduces SVG,
Microsoft becomes scared of Macromedia, Flash, and the tech they introduced in IE 3,
Adobe tries to make a Flash competitor, thinks better of it, and decides to subsume Macromedia instead,
Microsoft has a version of cross platform Java that actually works from their (then) new operating system XP,
Microsoft decides to kill Macromedia Flash, now Adobe Flash.
But what exactly is Silverlight?
In simple terms, it’s a new XML based vector file format called XAML, that runs inside of a Plugin in your browser powered by a version the .NET compact framework… and that’s it.
Microsoft has stripped of the graphics sub system of the new Vista OS, packaged it so other operating systems can run it, or at least implement their own versions of the Vista graphics system in side a browser.
Ok…. so what’s with this Silverlight 1.0, Silverlight 1.1, and Silverlight 2.0 stuff?
Well Microsoft realized that they needed to get this stuff out, or vista would never launch, and also build some excitement among the developers, developers, developers. So Microsoft took the number one feature of flash currently, aped it, improved it slightly, and released what they had to excite people, and get the intended target audience of this new technology (in this case their standard ASP.NET developers, and Graphical Designers) to point them in the right direction so they could release a killer product. What was this killer feature they copied from Flash? (the developers link above is a hint).
It can be argued that Youtube couldn’t have existed without Flash. Real Networks had tried something similar, with their horrible Real Media plugin, and it’s Library Feature that linked to featured videos where they hoped they could force you to watch commericals back in 2000. Apple had also stumbled upon online Video back in 1998 with Quicktime, but had never tried to capitalize on it… (even though their trailers page on the Apple.com website was once one of the most highly trafficked sites on the Internet).
This is big news, but it’s no Killer app.
But a few weeks after they release Silverlight 1.0 they tell developers about Silverlight 1.1. They release a very early alpha of Silverlight 1.1 along with some tools for it and ask for feedback from the developers, developers, developers.
What is silverlight 1.1? It’s Silverlight 1.0 + a new version of the .NET compact framework.
That means you can write c#, vb.net, and .net language, even c++.net code to manage what you see inside your browser plugin on someones client machine.
This is what the fuss about Silverlight is about. It’s a true Flash Killer, as it has the graphical ability, small plugin size, and multi platform capabilities of flash, but it’s easy to program in (and it uses an existing knowledgebase) inside THE best development environment out there, Visual Studio.
The thing was that Silverlight 1.1 was a reaaaaaaallllly early alpha. There was no controls, no real gui tools for programmers or designers to work with when trying to interact with this programming back end. The implications of this are huge, as are the timelines before the final version is relased, and to reduce confusion between the two versions (as 1.0 is nothing like 1.1) they rename Silverlight 1.1 to Silverlight 2.0.
OK, cool, but why will this succeed when Adobe’s effort failed?
A) Microsoft is pimping it, and they’re not afraid to spend big time money to do so.
B) It has online video which was one of the major features that SVG lacked (mainly due to codec licensing issues)
C) Microsoft has also released tools to create content for it as well….
That last point is what would have me quaking in my boots right now if I was Adobe. To support Silverlight Microsoft has also released the Expression Suite. It includes several SKUs.
- Expression Blend: Microsoft’s answer to Flash Studio, it’s also the interface point between Developers and Visual studio, and Designers and their graphics tools.
- Expression Design: Microsoft’s answer to Adobe Illustrator… THE industry standard when creating vector graphics.
- Expression Media Encoder: Microsoft’s answer to a light weight verison of Adobe’s Final Cut Pro. Designed expressly so that you can edit and encode video for the web, and your own personal Youtube knockoffs.
- Expression Web: Microsoft’s answer to Adobe Dreamweaver. Granted Microsoft hasn’t had much luck here in the past with their sad Frontpage story, but it’s designed as an also has feature inside the Expression suite, a free gimmie…. It also uses the same layout rules as Visual Studio, so that when your graphics designer creates a site template, it translates seamlessly to ASP.net when a programmer has to add code to it, instead of slicing and dicing, and ruining a layout a designer created so you can add the asp.net goodness.
These aren’t just regular Microsoft creative tools either:
Just looking at these you can tell Microsoft is serious about competing with the Adobe CS suite. The interface is entirely different from all standard Microsoft Development technologies. These tools have been designed explicitly for Graphics Professionals, not developers who think they know design.
Granted that these are Microsoft version 1.0 products, but you can tell Microsoft isn’t messing around here.
Usualy I also like to point out things outside of the microsoft koolaid when looking at their new technologies. (Maybe it’s my contrarian nature). But it’s worth mentioning a few other points on why silverlight is so exciting.
- They’re bringing this to the Mac. Traditionally the Mac has been the Red headed step child of Microsoft’s development efforts. But they’ve released Silverlight on Safari right off the bat.
- They’re supporting Firefox out of the box as well. It’s kind of interesting that alot of Microsoft’s own developers aren’t using IE7 either… and that they realize that to they need to cover all their bases when dealing with this
- That crazy guy I mentioned before? He’s implementing this on Linux, in an open source way. That means it’s possible that Silverlight will run on what ever piece of hardware you through at it eventually (The story of how he started the Moonlight project is also amazing)
- The fact that Microsoft is actually helping Miguel as well
As you can obviously tell, i’m excited about Silverlight, and after suffering though my tome here, i hope you are too.
Back when I was at university ~2001 someone in the archeology department decided on a lark to apply for a huge grant of money.
In a totally spur of the moment decision they decided it would be cool if the department had a 3d laser scanner. And since the total for the scanner didn’t amount to the total of the grant and this scanner was going to produce massive amounts of data the also threw in a 1TB file server (at a point when a 30GB hard drive was unbelievable) as joke to store the data from the scanner and maybe the compsci dept might be able to use it (in a totally incongruent example of inter department generosity).
Turns out they were the only ones to apply for this grant and won it by default.
So in a few weeks the department received a high quality 3d scanner and parts for a 1 TB file server. (had to show the people who gave the grant the receipts). As far as I know the scanner was used maybe twice.. and sat in a small room collecting dust….. The file server was a similarly sad tale.
Now put this piece of equipment in a place where us Comp. Sci students could have played with it and we might have had some cool stuff. Instead the scanner collected dust, and the file server well it languished.
It was a Dell raid system in a cabinet that went from the floor to the ceiling, with special raid controllers and some 40 250Gb drives.
And that’s when the politic-ing began. Eventually it was decided that this 1TB server array would be swapped with the current Account storage system, and the archiologists could use the current storage system from the account server, but due to politics and the fact that by this point the term had started and the network guys were a little cagey about it… it was too late to set it for that year. So for the whole year the whole system sat in boxes collecting dust in the server room ( which happend to be seperated from the regular comp sci labs by glass windows next to one of the most high traffic areas on the campus so everyone could see these boxes and boxes of dell equipment collecting dust.
Next year I came back to find the boxes emptied and the 1 TB file server assembled in the middle of the white server room that was in turn encased in glass. It looked like the Obelisk from 2001. Too bad it wasn’t working.
The certified Dell guy had come and assembled the system before term started, but hadn’t been able to configure it for the novel network…. My buddy in the network staff told me he could have done it, but under the Dell Service contract that the server had come with he wasn’t allowed to touch it.
So again the Server sat there collecting dust for another year.
When I eventually graduated they’d yet to hook it up to the network (but I understood the network guys used it as their local storage system).
It was a waste of gargantuan proportions. Computers like food should have a best before date, and this drool worthy piece of equipment had rotted on the vine.
Anyways I’ve now got a digital camera that takes 20Meg Picutres, and contains a 2Gb card. Between the camera and my Bit torrent collection of tv shows and movies from not having TV for 2 years I’ve come to fill the 300Gb drive i have in my desktop machine. At work I have a 500 GB external drive for my laptop that boggles the mind at how small it is…. now I see this: A 1 TB desktop portable drive.
And I’m thinking I might need one for my rapidly expanding collection of “Media”.
And there’s something that makes me feel very old when I look at a drive that’s the size of a large book, that used to stand taller than I was only a few very short years ago.
This shouldn’t surprise me… my first computer had a 20 Meg drive that weighed more than 20lbs. But the 1TB boundary seems like it should be more significant. My Comp. Sci prof from university had a funny story about a 5 MB drive that was the size of a washing machine… He now stores his work on a 1GB USB key chain drive.
Maybe I’m just getting old.
Not quite a developer challenge, but here’s what I hope to accomplish before Xmas.
Do a custom control i’ve been thinking about.
Do a website based on the Blue bird data I’ve been hoarding for 3 years now.
Do a website based on the Blue bird data I’ve been hoarding for 3 years now.
Get off my ass and at least prototype the 2 ideas I’ve had for XNA games. (Fog of war is for suckers… relativity/message delay should replace it)
Oh and in further XNA news… I’ve just gotten an Xbox360. But that was an odyssey/trial/story/blog posting all unto itself.
It’s late (or early depending on how you look at it) and my internal filters that keep me from posting on my blog have dissolved. sooooo here I am…
Time to tell my interesting/embarrassing story for the summer.
A few weeks ago I went out to see if I could see the meteor shower (the Perseids). I drove a half hour out into the country to see if I could find some dark skies at 12:30 in the morning. I drove south of town towards St. Agathe, out into the darkness… I found the darkest gravel road that I could find and turned off the road and drove for a few miles to escape any lights. I didn’t stop until I couldn’t see a light for miles around me.
I got out of the car with my camera, tripod and set up the camera for 5 minute exposures.
I then turned around proceded to close the door to my car on pure muscle memory.
With my keys inside the locked door.
There I was, locked out of my own car and not a light for miles around. After debating smashing my car window for a few minutes I set off walking down the road to see the house I could just see down the long and straight road.
After walking for quite a while I came to the house I could see, and discovered a familly packing it in for the night. They’d been having a campfire and looking at the meteors as well. After explaining my situation to the children I found, they offered me the use of their phone, and I called CAA.
After sheepishly explaining I’d locked my keys inside my car, they agreed to send my a tow truck to jimmy the lock on my car and let me in, as long as they could get an address of where to go. Turning to the family I asked them the address…… They didn’t know.
So I soon discovered that most of the family didn’t speak English that well. The only person somewhat fluent was a 7 year old. The rest of them spoke German with broken English, the amount of English diminishing as the children got older…
I soon explained the situation to the familly and after some finger pointing I managed to convince the Father of the family who spoke the worst English of the bunch to drive me in to town with his son as a translator.
I got to my apartment (again with out keys) and after convincing someone in my apartment to let me in at 1 AM. I managed to get my spare set of keys and then got a ride back to my car from the same German family.
So after swallowing all my pride and paying off the family with cash for the gas they’d used and what I would have spent on a locksmith I arrived back at my car and drove back to town with my tail between my legs
To add Icing to the cake I came within millimeters of hitting a skunk on the drive back.
They say that this type of thing builds character…. It builds something but I’m not quite sure what.
I haven’t’ posted over the summer… well because… it’s summer….
(I have precedent to maintain)…
1) We’re still hiring…. (things have been a little crazy around here)
2) I’ve bought some new lenses lately, but haven’t had time to post about them.
3) I’m paying for internet again
Link of the Day:
quote: [this] somewhat pushes the limits of what it is sensible to do with regular expressions
[This is a draft I stared a few months back, but never got around to finishing]
Oh the idiocy continues and forces me to dump a major rant onto the steaming pile of crap that is the interweb.
Are you alive? Maybe? Well then you may be violating a patent. (specifically patent WO2007047148, or the one mentioned in the title). Don’t worry about the artificial part, I’ll get to that.
I love the quote in the article linked to by Slashdot on the kerfuffle.
The idea of owning a species breaches “a societal boundary,” said Pat Mooney of the Ottawa, Canada-based ETC Group, which is asking the patent applicants to drop their claim. Creating and owning an organism, he added, means that “for the first time, God has competition.”
I don’t really care about the God part either, but the gaul of the people applying for these patents amazes me… Really it’s only second to the incredulity I have that someone allows these people to patent crap like this.
The engineer in me recognizes why you’d want to create the simplest form of life possible, it’s the genetic equivalent of a “Hello World” computer program (the simplest and first computer program just about everyone writes). But idea to patent said organism is insane.
It’s as if a carpenter decided to try and patent the nail, or better yet the hammer.
Any type of genetic work possible could be construed to be built off of this (and licensable… so you’d have to pay these bastards anytime you want to do anything in the genetics field).
Adding complications to this wouldn’t be hard. Since this organism is self replicating (by definition) would it have to pay royalties on itself?
You’d obviously have to pay them if you want to have any type of genetic work done upon yourself (the most commonly believed way to deliver any type of genetic modification is to use a virus or an artificially engineered virus to distribute the genes and genetic changes you want made into the host organism). Then since said changes would be passed to your children, presumably, but I wouldn’t put it past the drug companies to a) make it so said changes don’t get passed to your children so that they have to buy the same cure or b) make you license the cure for any children you may have, or worst case c) the cure would make you infertile until you could pay for a cure b that would allow you to pass on said cure a (ala licensing fees mentioned above)… or failing that buying a cure for disease A infects you with disease B… call it planned obsolescence.
Now some may say that that’s going to extremes, and to some extent it’s true, but 20 years ago who would have imagined patenting a living organism, or patenting parts of the human genome…
The reality is that all the legal bullshit is scaring away researchers from working on stuff that’s really important- mainly diseases and genetic mutations that are killing people. Lawyers and accountants are determining what drugs are being researched, and more importantly what drugs are being made. It appears that Death and Taxes may not be mutually exclusive.
Penicillin was discovered by accident, and developed into a drug during WW2. Now adays a company like phiser would license it and charge the army billions for a new wonder drug. In 1942 a dose of penicillin cost $20 but by 1946 they’d figured out how to reduce the cost to $0.55 a dose. But there hasn’t been a new Anti-biotic developed since the 70’s since it’s more profitable to create “treatments” as opposed to cures…. Add baby boomers trying to extend their cholestoeral clogged arteries and you see why the drug companies are pimping lipitor etc.
Just a note to anyone who reads my blog…. Imaginets is hiring people.
So send us your resume to the link on the imaginets website, or you can send them to me and I’ll forward them on….
cams at imaginets dot com
or my personal email of camboprime at gmail
It’s not that bad to work with me…. I don’t smell that bad, and I only get really irrational after working 16 hour days for 6 weeks…. Up until week 5 you’re alright 😉
Honestly this is one of the best places i’ve ever worked. Different. But good!